<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://net11.web-ready.com.au/?feed=rss2&#038;p=39" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://net11.web-ready.com.au/?p=39</link>
	<description>The Internet and Bicycles for the Mind: Mandy's Net11 Learning Log</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 06:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: philip travers</title>
		<link>http://net11.web-ready.com.au/?p=39#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>philip travers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://net11.web-ready.com.au/?p=39#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I wonder sometimes wether blogs are worth it,and seeing many Fairfax Journalists weren't used this morning,and some of the news was still worthy,rather than hyping commercial matters alone,on the online version at least,accept for Morris Iemma,I wonder about this new media belief in self.I am glad Andrew is operating still,as I hope he finds some way of repowering himself,as a worthy citizen,if not have another go at politics,with a stronger sense of fight.I dont find much on blogs I didn't know already!Accept some peoples opinions,and how they tenaciously hang onto them often against,I am sure, the best they could do elsewhere! KeeleyNet.com remains the site,at this time that remains to be observed ,at two day intervals,and DavidIcke.com stirs up my need to be forceful sometimes in opinion.I am fighting a war of technology by just breathing sometimes,and little hope of not participating no longer in it,whilst mental symptoms can be ascribed by apparent physical bases.I await a more thorough insistence,sometimes,by larger numbers of people to know when they are not producing the stimulant that makes them hear words before they are described and defined by their production,in any form of communication attempt.At Infowars.com I see emerging physical conditions developing ,as they deal with something that,the mainstream journalists feel completely threatened about.I saw a young man speaking into his microphone and a shaking condition took over for a while.I was looking into the computer earlier this morning,dropped to sleep for about fifteen seconds,and was spun to my left two steps,at an angle of 45 degrees.Luckily I grabbed something upright.We havent got enough people interested enough in Australia,to define symptoms of disease,other than the obvious physical base pressing the conditions forward.Conventional thinking is more durable,pays well,and can survive,if ,you keep bloody quite.It is also true the physical basis of a malady will press in eventually,if it isnt unable to be treated  at its cause.What I am experiencing ,calls upon a unconstructed Psychological Defence,I cannot defend myself,that is my only defence.That works to a point,because the technology as process repeats ,intentional matters.Hard Evidence magazine,and a writer by the name of Baird.. is the only one who is getting close to description malady.When prominent people claim matters similar to myself,they are already showing major symptoms,as in Yeltsin,with alcoholic problems,whilst discredited in a historical sense,I believe what he said about that,because what he said makes its own common sense.An alcoholic maybe a deeply self-aware person dealing with matters totally beyond any type of personal control, like having to disbelieve what one is thinking,whilst knowing even that has been stimulated to happen... as some new thought arises that is without any merit to self,and never would be.Humans accept their own madnesses too easily,and professionals will willingly hurry the process along.Looking at the U.S.A. today ,it is very easy to see,that maybe the technology accounts for many cerebral activity failures.The brainwashing self doubt accumulating or its unbearable opposite,is being dosed remotely right into the skull ,via, means as yet unable by me, to trace. Take this as you will.But do not accept any opinion forming in your head,until researched,do not accept any visualisation of me,or anything I have written,unless it is in the commonality of your own mind and how it normally works.Do not accept the conclusion I have made until,you can describe that in a way that isnt ,or cannot be a tracing left on you,by the progress of communicating I have tried to express here.That is,I am bound to be accident prone,diminish that threat in your life if,the uneasy conclusion occurs,that you have been remotely nobbled,like the rapist and the use of pills in pub scenes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder sometimes wether blogs are worth it,and seeing many Fairfax Journalists weren&#8217;t used this morning,and some of the news was still worthy,rather than hyping commercial matters alone,on the online version at least,accept for Morris Iemma,I wonder about this new media belief in self.I am glad Andrew is operating still,as I hope he finds some way of repowering himself,as a worthy citizen,if not have another go at politics,with a stronger sense of fight.I dont find much on blogs I didn&#8217;t know already!Accept some peoples opinions,and how they tenaciously hang onto them often against,I am sure, the best they could do elsewhere! KeeleyNet.com remains the site,at this time that remains to be observed ,at two day intervals,and DavidIcke.com stirs up my need to be forceful sometimes in opinion.I am fighting a war of technology by just breathing sometimes,and little hope of not participating no longer in it,whilst mental symptoms can be ascribed by apparent physical bases.I await a more thorough insistence,sometimes,by larger numbers of people to know when they are not producing the stimulant that makes them hear words before they are described and defined by their production,in any form of communication attempt.At Infowars.com I see emerging physical conditions developing ,as they deal with something that,the mainstream journalists feel completely threatened about.I saw a young man speaking into his microphone and a shaking condition took over for a while.I was looking into the computer earlier this morning,dropped to sleep for about fifteen seconds,and was spun to my left two steps,at an angle of 45 degrees.Luckily I grabbed something upright.We havent got enough people interested enough in Australia,to define symptoms of disease,other than the obvious physical base pressing the conditions forward.Conventional thinking is more durable,pays well,and can survive,if ,you keep bloody quite.It is also true the physical basis of a malady will press in eventually,if it isnt unable to be treated  at its cause.What I am experiencing ,calls upon a unconstructed Psychological Defence,I cannot defend myself,that is my only defence.That works to a point,because the technology as process repeats ,intentional matters.Hard Evidence magazine,and a writer by the name of Baird.. is the only one who is getting close to description malady.When prominent people claim matters similar to myself,they are already showing major symptoms,as in Yeltsin,with alcoholic problems,whilst discredited in a historical sense,I believe what he said about that,because what he said makes its own common sense.An alcoholic maybe a deeply self-aware person dealing with matters totally beyond any type of personal control, like having to disbelieve what one is thinking,whilst knowing even that has been stimulated to happen&#8230; as some new thought arises that is without any merit to self,and never would be.Humans accept their own madnesses too easily,and professionals will willingly hurry the process along.Looking at the U.S.A. today ,it is very easy to see,that maybe the technology accounts for many cerebral activity failures.The brainwashing self doubt accumulating or its unbearable opposite,is being dosed remotely right into the skull ,via, means as yet unable by me, to trace. Take this as you will.But do not accept any opinion forming in your head,until researched,do not accept any visualisation of me,or anything I have written,unless it is in the commonality of your own mind and how it normally works.Do not accept the conclusion I have made until,you can describe that in a way that isnt ,or cannot be a tracing left on you,by the progress of communicating I have tried to express here.That is,I am bound to be accident prone,diminish that threat in your life if,the uneasy conclusion occurs,that you have been remotely nobbled,like the rapist and the use of pills in pub scenes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
